Week 3 discussion 1

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, refer to your course text Chapter 3 and these websites: Programs for Seniors, Help for Families, What We Do, About VA, About Us, What Is the Difference Between Medicare and Medicaid?, and Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP). Then discuss what you regard as the three most significant welfare programs or policies in the American human services system and describe how they have changed how people have been helped over the course of time. Think about the many programs available for older adults, those who need financial assistance, children, and veterans: What would we do without them? Consider how effective are policies for social security benefits, medical care, and food vouchers. Do they successfully assist people? Why or why not?

Guided Response: Review several of your classmates’ posts and respond to at least two of your peers by 11:59 p.m. on Day 7 of the week. You are encouraged to post your required replies earlier in the week to promote more meaningful and interactive discourse in this discussion.

Examine your classmates’ selections for the three most significant welfare programs or policies in the American human services system. Do you agree or disagree with these selections? What are your reactions to your classmates’ conclusions about how effective the policies are for social security benefits, medical care, and food vouchers? Do you agree or disagree? What alternative thoughts would you share? Support your thoughts with evidence from the required readings. Continue to monitor the discussion forum until Day 7 of the week and respond to anyone who replies to your initial post.

Reply

Replies

Feteke Coulibaly

Oct 27, 2021 at 2:52 PM

The three most significant welfare programs to my opinion are Medicaid, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP and Veterans Assistance. Over the years Medicaid has grown subsequently and have helped millions of people. The program was made for families of low income and is designed to have those family pay little to no copay for medical services. From 1977 all the way up to 1997, Medicare has helped about 13.5 million of people. (Provost & Hughes, 2000)

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program was designed to eradicate hunger and malnutrition and provide adequate nutrition and diet by supplementing families with additional income to meet those ends. Over the years the program has went through major renovation as legislation decided to change up the eligibility for maximum reward of food stamp. Reward for food stamps is dependent on the family income. A family with zero income is eligible with 100% of the benefits. The changes made was to give the states more administrative over and removing immigrants or non-legal citizens to be able to be eligible for the program. (Caswell, 2013)

The Veteran’s Assistance was created to help service members transition into civilian life. Over the years the VA has improved tremendously in helping veterans’ quality of life. The introduction of the GI bill, home loans as well as employment assistance has made a great difference in quality of life for transitioning service members. (Adler, 27 September 2017)

In today’s life, the absence of human service programs would create a great imbalance in the United States. The mortality rate would increase due to the lack of access to medical facility, funds to purchase food and shelter and an increase in crime. There will not be enough jobs available to cover the millions of people that need the programs not even mentioning individuals with mental disability, older population and children.

I personally feel like the policies for social security benefits, medical care and food vouchers needs to be updated every year to match the social economy. As we are moving forward the cost of living is increasing as well as food and medical coverage. For example, if 100$ was used to purchase groceries 2 years ago, this same 100$ value has decreased and may not be enough to cover the necessity for a proper nutritional meal.

References:

Adler, J. L. (n.d.). The evolution of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Scholars Strategy Network. Retrieved October 27, 2021, from https://scholars.org/contribution/evolution-us-department-veterans-affairs.

Caswell, J. A. (2013, April 23). History, background, and goals of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Examining the Evidence to Define Benefit Adequacy. Retrieved October 27, 2021, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK206907/.

Provost, C., & Hughes, P. (2000). Medicaid: 35 years of Service. Health care financing review. Retrieved October 27, 2021, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194689/.

adrijah Smith

Oct 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM

Three of the most significant welfare programs are Medicaid, SNAP, and TANF. Medicaid is an assistance program. It serves low-income persons of every age. Patients usually pay no part costs for covered medicaid expenses. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides nutrition benefits to supplement the food budget of needy families so they can purchase healthy food and move forward self-sufficiency. TANF is temporary assistance for needy families. Most people that are on TANF are the low-income based families. Human services have drastically changed overtime. In the beginning there were only almshouses but now there are so many more programs that are available for children, elderly, veterans, the disabled, and low-income persons. Without these programs for those in need, there would be more homeless people and people dying from sickness that they cannot afford to get checked out. In my opinion, these programs do successfully assist people.

ORDER THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER AND GET 20% DICOUNT. USE CODE: GET2O

week 3 discussion 1

Prepare: In your first post in this discussion, you will identify and apply one ethical theory of your choosing to a current problem in business, also of your choosing. Start by reviewing your notes on the Week 1 course material and your completed work for Week 1. Then, choose one of the three ethical theories—i.e., utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics—on the basis of your thoughtfully considered preference in general and independent of the business problem that you will select here. Keep in mind that you will employ this ethical theory for supporting your position not only for this discussion, but also for this week’s assignment and the Final Project.

To prepare for your selection of the current problem in business, look at the list of required articles and multimedia which are divided in the six case-categories as follows:

  • Banking (Lehman Brothers)
  • Environment (BP)
  • GMOs (Monsanto)
  • Pharmaceuticals (Merck)
  • Gender Discrimination (Goodyear)
  • Factory Farms (Perdue) Choose the case-category that you find the most interesting and note that each category also corresponds to one particular case. Please choose carefully because your choice for this discussion will establish the case that will be central to your argumentative essay this week as well as your Final Project in Week 5. It is recommended that you leaf through all the required resources indicated for the possible case-categories that you identify as possible contenders before making your final choice. Reflect: Once you have selected your ethical theory and your case category, articulate the characteristics of the economic system (or combination of both systems) that serves as the setting for the case presented in the case category sources. Given this context, examine how the nation’s laws affect the operations of the business. Next, identify the characteristics of your chosen ethical theory and its notion of the moral good. For the latter, you will need to review again the PowerPoint that was introduced in Week 1, which is also listed in this week’s Required Resources and it is titled The Moral Good in Three Traditional Ethical Theories. Then, think how you would apply the ethical theory to the specific problem presented in the case category sources. Write: Start your post by (a) identifying the issue or problem that you want to address in the case that you have selected and providing an impartial presentation of the controversy, (b) articulating briefly the characteristics of the economic system that serves as the setting, and (c) examining the laws that affect the operations of the business. The following illustration should help. Consider, for example, the case of Uber that we examined in Week 2. If the California decision establishes a precedent for similar claims, then Uber would have to do business as an employer and not merely as a service that pairs consumers with ride sharing services by means of a unique phone app. Accordingly, the law would require Uber to reimburse its drivers for certain costs and perhaps offer benefits. Take in consideration, then, the legal setting for the case that you have chosen. Does the case take place in the United States or another country? What are the laws that are relevant to the problem under examination? Keep in mind that all laws are constraints on our actions, whether those by individuals or corporations. The relevant laws, then, will be (a) any laws that present not only a constraint on the company’s operations, (b) any laws that are being violated by the corporation, or (c) any laws that unfairly limit the goods and services that can be offered to and are demanded by consumers. In a second paragraph, formulate a sentence that presents the moral position that you want to defend in regard to the issue or problem introduced in the previous paragraph. In the same paragraph, present the ethical theory that you choose to employ. Your choices are utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, and the necessary material is included in the required readings and media. Make sure to identify the characteristics of the ethical theory, and include in-text citations and full references in APA form at the end of the post. Once you have done this, apply the ethical theory to your selected case by explaining how it lends itself to the moral position that you are defending.
    Requirements for Your Initial Post:
  • Your initial post should be at least 400 words in length and have citations and references in APA notation. It should address the prompt in its entirety. This means that you should not split your response to the prompt in multiple posts. Your examination should be both thorough and succinct. This is a combination that demands time and thought, so give yourself sufficient time to draft and revise.
  • Please be advised that until you post, you will not see what your fellow students are posting. Once you submit your post, you will be able to view the posts from your other classmates. You can then proceed to reply to at least two different threads based on the required material for this discussion.
  • Your list of references for your initial post should include the videos and the other required reading material pertaining to your chosen subject heading, as well as the ethics, economic, and law components of Weeks 1 and 2, the Instructor Guidance, and any other announcements presented to you by your professor. In addition, your references should include any other sources that you consult to inform yourself about your chosen case category (but not Wikipedia or similar sources).
  • Your initial post for this discussion should be submitted no later than the end of Thursday (11:59 pm, U.S. Mountain time).
    Hardy, J, Foster, C., & Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). Section 9.1: The Argumentative EssayPreview the document. In With good reason: A guide to critical thinking. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/
  • Section 9.1: The Argumentative Essay is a section of Chapter 9 of the introductory course in logic textbook that is employed in the PHI103 Informal Logic course offered at Ashford University. The link for this source will take you to a PDF format of this chapter. Section 9.1 introduces the thesis and premises in an argumentative essay, which are elements that students in this course must employ in both assignments in this course.

Hardy, J, Foster, C., & Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). Section 9.2: Strengthening the Argumentative EssayPreview the document. In With good reason: A guide to critical thinking. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/

  • Section 9.2: Strengthening the Argumentative Essay is a section of Chapter 9 of the introductory course in logic textbook that is employed in the PHI103 Informal Logic course offered at Ashford University. The link for this source will take you to a PDF format of this chapter. For the purposes of the work for this week, it will be necessary to read only thesubsection called Clarification and Support. This subsection explains the kind of support needed in an argumentative essay for the claims offered in its premises, which students in this course must know in order to apply in discussions and both assignments.

Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). The moral good in three traditional ethical theoriesPreview the document [PowerPoint Slides].

  • This PowerPoint document covers the main characteristics of utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, and what is the moral good in each of these.
  • **** I want this to be about Gender Discrimination.*****

ORDER THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER AND GET 20% DICOUNT. USE CODE: GET2O